There is no substitute for truth

Of course I had identified a clearly defined market for Bun Yom’s book Tomorrow I’m Dead. I knew who would buy it, who would read it, where they would buy it and how long it would take them to finish it. I am a marketing expert who knows this sort of thing. I knew that our primary market was equally disbursed between male and female over 18 years olds and I knew that our market was highly correlated with education, socio-economic status and readership of related material. I knew all about this market, but I was wrong, dead wrong.

After Bun’s presentation there was a line waiting to meet him and have their book signed. I stood there paying little attention until I heard a young man, maybe 12 years old, insist “I just want to meet him Mom!” I watched the struggle until Mom relented and the boy got in line.

Then it happened. Right before my eyes the truth unfolded. A truth that had alluded me. Half of the people in line were under 18! Many were not yet old enough to drive. The woman talking to Bun was buying three books he was signing for each of her children. How could I have missed this? How could I, who preach this daily, have been so presumptuous that I would base all of my knowing on my own preconceived beliefs rather than careful observation of the truth?

These young people weren’t alive during the Killing Fields, they don’t know about world history, and they probably can’t spell Cambodia, how could this be? Once again I missed. The prerequisite for interest was not prior knowledge or academic prowess, it was curiosity. Curiosity about this world, its inhabitants, and a profound inquiry into their own nature.

My faux pas was confirmed this morning as Bun spoke to 200 High School students. In these youth this curiosity was vibrant, alive, insistent. They had not yet learned to replace inquiry with history as I had done. Training is good, education is good, expertise is good, but there is no substitute for truth.

The only contest I’ve ever won

One of the only contests I have ever won was a regional resume writing contest my English professor required us to enter. I was badly in need of a boost to my English grade so I decided that if I was going to enter this contest, I would do my best to win. As the resumes were turned in that day, I could see that there were many adept graphic designers and many excellent writers in my class. I could also see that I would have had little chance of winning the contest had I not figured out a unique way to differentiate my resume from all the rest. You see, all of the other resumes were printed on 8 1/2″ x 11″ paper, the virtually required standard in the resume world. Mine, however, was printed on 14″ legal size paper and cut down to 11  1/32 long. Only 1/32 of an inch longer than all the others. An imperceptible difference you would think. I saw my professor flip through the stack of resumes and watched her stop on mine, for just an instant, as her finger moved across that extra 32nd of an inch. I knew at that moment I had won. Sure enough, I did – first place!

It is interesting to note that the judges stated the reason for my winning as: clean format, well written with clearly defined categories, but I know the real reason. Out of thousands of resumes they picked mine, not because it was written better, neater, or more graphically appealing, but because I had differentiated it from all the rest, in a way the judges didn’t even realize. That was the day I learned that you don’t have to beat your competitors by much.

Morality will destroy Integrity

Morality is, in our society, thought of as a good thing, a noble thing, a pathway to God. Indeed, there is a place for morality, just as it is appropriate for a parent to keep their child from playing in the street, but, like the child, there comes a time when our actions must be directed by another source if we are ever to be free.

Morality dictates that we obey an exterior set of guideline. Sometimes guidelines we have chosen, but usually guidelines that we are use to. Guidelines that someone else thought of which they would like us to adopt. Therein lies the genesis of guilt, shame, anger, hatred, discontent, and all manner of separateness.

If we follow the path of morality we may not get hit by the car, but eventually, if we don’t discard the external decree and step out on our own, we will live forever in the confines of our own front yard. It is a risk we must take if we want to have a chance of finding true joy.

I always admire the gay, the outcast, the deviant, the bad dancer. It’s easy to conform, but on the way to freedom we will always find that we are somehow different, somehow odd, somehow not the way we are suppose to be. A thought creeps into our mind that clouds the status quo with questions about our true nature. At first it’s a whisper we can ignore, but in the benevolent way of this universe it gets louder and louder until it screams at us “let me out of here!” Then, no matter what closet you’re in, you have a choice to make, live or die. It’s really that simple, and it’s really that crucial, but it’s not really that easy. It it were we would never have gone into the closet in the first place. It’s not easy to come out into the light, most of us never do, but it’s infinitely more . . . more, more something that is quite . . . remarkable.

There is a proper way to dance, a silent decree that dictates what is and is not appropriate on the dance floor. Often, I hear a snyde remark, a snicker, a laugh “look at that” I hear as they point to a man or woman with no sense of rhythm who is dancing in the front alone. I bow to them. They are willing to forgo the appropriate, the proper, the externally imposed rules about what is and is not appropriate in their mosh pit world. Eccentric he is called, in insult, and I bow even lower.

Eccentric becomes not only the ultimate compliment, but the only true way to live, only in eccentricity can we find joy, only in eccentricity can we find God, only in eccentricity can we finally find the one thing we so desperately want to find, ourself. Would you really like to be like the people in the “center” anyway?

What is your choice? The safe, path of societal approval, or the “Road Less Travelled,” the dangerous path of integrity? Morality is infinitely easier, but I assure you, when you break through the barrier of externally imposed shackles, the light will shine brighter than you had ever imagined possible. But you already know that.

Our decisions are not made in our brain

Our decisions are not made in our brain. We think they are, we get a headache from thinking too much, but in the final analysis, even for the most left-brain autocrat you know, our decisions are made elsewhere. Whether we are selling our product, negotiating with a child, or trying to get our way, a conscious awareness of this will be infinitely valuable. First off, we have been taught that our thinking cells are all inside our cranium, but we now know that this is simply not the case. Our thinking cells are everywhere, all of our cells participate in the process. Not only that, but consider the possibility that our brain is not a reservoir of accumulated knowledge, but a communication device, not a hard drive, but a modem (with a processor).  In Mac terms, its an airport express (hard drive & hot spot). Then we really start to wonder where the thinking process is taking place.

So, we go to a restaurant and have a delightful experience

 

My son and I went to a pizza restaurant last year. They brought us the wrong meal and forgot our drinks, then, to make matters worse, we couldn’t find a waiter, for a long time. We finally got ourselves water and ate the unordered food. When our waiter finally showed up we explained our displeasure. He apologized profusely and when her returned told us that our meal was on the restaurant and gave us each a coupon for another free meal.

 

 

MAKING IT RIGHT WITH YOUR CUSTOMER

The Richter Scale for measuring Japanese earthquake magnitude

The Richter Scale is a logarithmic scale that has been used for measuring the seismic energy given off by earthquakes since the 1930s. While it serves a scientific purpose when measuring small tremors that occur every day, it’s exponential nature makes it very impractical for use when describing earthquake magnitude in easily quantifiable terms.

We think of a scale as a linear continuums where each segment is equal. Not so on the Richter Scale. On the Richter Scale each whole number increase represents a ten-fold increase in seismic energy. So, a 2 is ten times greater than a 1, and a 7 is 100 times greater than a 5. As you can see, it is difficult to get an accurate sense of magnitude when using the Richter Scale without converting to “real numbers.”

As shown in the chart below, the Japanese earthquake scored a record-breaking 9 on the Richter Scale. That seems like a little more that double a 4, when in fact a 4 scores a 1,000 (one thousand) and a 9 scores a 100,000,000 (one hundred million). Quite a change in perspective wouldn’t you say?

Richter Scale = conversion to “real numbers”

1 = 1

2 = 10

3 = 100

4 = 1,000

5 = 10,000

6 = 100,000

7 = 1,000,000

8 = 10,000,000

9 = 100,000,000

10 = 1,000,000,000

The Ultimate Inventor’s Handbook is now available on Kindle

The Ultimate Inventor’s Handbook is now available on Kindle.  Don’t forget you can alway get the book resources hardcopies on our website.

Less is definitely more

How many times have I heard “My resume has to be two page so I can include all the stuff I’ve done.” True, possibly, but your resume reader is only going to catch about seven point on the entire document, might be a good idea to take out all the less-important points. This is true for virtually everything you write. Figure out what is most important and get rid of the rest. Then, you control what is read, and it might help keep your reader from getting lost. Could you figure out the way to Mt. Hood while you’re moving? Neither can your reader.

Give up controlling interest!

Give up controlling interest! “What?” you say. “Let someone else have control of my life’s work?” You’ve got to be kidding?

I understand this is a hard pill to swallow, but look at it from an investor’s point of view. Why should they put their hard earned money into coffers that you control? There is a reason they have that money. They’ve played the game and won more than they’ve lost (or they picked their parents well). Wise investors know that inventors can be a shifty lot. I’ve watched it happen. Just when they are about to hit a home run, the inventor decides to finish up another project first, redesign for the umpteenth time, or spend the investor’s money on a “research trip.” The investor without controlling interest stands there while their money pours down the drain, and there is nothing they can do.

Sometimes this can be resolved by bringing in a mutually agreed upon third party who is given two shares to participate in the decision making process should there be a disagreement. With 49% ownership neither party can move without the blessing of either their partner or the 2% shareholder.

Once your invention is thriving there are all sorts of buy-back plans, stock options, and other vehicles that will allow you to gain back controlling interest. Until that time your controlling investor may be your best friend. They are providing the capital you need and they are keeping you in line. If you’ve picked your investor right they know what they are doing, they want you to win, and they can bring business savvy to the venture that the typical inventor often lacks. It’s a good deal for you!

If you insist on maintaining control 90% of your investors are going to walk out the door – and do you really want the remaining 10% on your team?

Advertising or articles?

I was asked today “Which works better, advertising or articles?”  The answer? Generally, articles. Much better to have someone else flaunting your merit. It’s called PR. Besides, articles are free, and someone else will often do the work for you. Tough to beat. “Then why does anyone advertise?” Good question. Some because they don’t know any better, and others because they have mastered the human psyche and the media and they know that they serve two distinct purposes, and that they work very well together. The neophyte will assume, always, that there is no point in putting a paid advertisement in a publication when there is already going to be an article about you. The Guru knows that the advertisement will have infinitely more impact if it is in the same publication as the article. Frequency over reach, again. They also know that the article will have infinitely more impact with the advertisement. Far more bang for your buck. But the clincher is, and there are two of them: 1) You can write your own article for them to publish which gives you total control over what is said, and 2) if you tell the publication that you want to run your next ad in their publication with your article you will be virtually assured your article will be published.  There you go, add the square inches and multiply the effect. Buy a 100 square inch add and have them print a 400 (or 4,000) square inch article. Then, multiply the draw and you have exponential impact. So, I would say the answer to the original answer is obviously “Both.”

Thoughts cause feelings, circumstances do not

I appreciate the many responses to the earlier post, so I will say this again, and yet again after I’ve had some sleep. Thoughts cause feelings, circumstances do not. I know, I know, it sounds backward from everything you have ever thought. Yet, one moment of introspection and you can see that this is true. Feelings are caused by thoughts. Watch yourself for a day and this will become apparent. Then try to grasp the fact that feelings cause circumstances, all circumstances. When you understand that conundrum, and apply it, you will have mastered the world.

I appreciate the email discussion, but how about posting your thoughts as a comment so others can see our discussion.  I will eventually get to all of your questions.  My best,  Bill